Talk:Fortune-499

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 17:50, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that in Fortune-499, the main character has to prevent monsters from acquiring the company where she works by playing rock paper scissors with them? Source: [1]
  • ALT1: ... that in Fortune-499, an oracle plays rock paper scissors with monsters?

• Reviewed: Winter Garden Theatre

Created by Ezlev (talk). Self-nominated at 20:35, 29 November 2021 (UTC).

• Approve Main Hook The article was made today, so is new enough, and it is long enough, reads neutrally, has inline citations, and the copyvio detector is only picking up the direct quotes. I think the main hook is more interesting and has an inline citation. The QPQ has been done. All good to go! Silverseren^C 22:26, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
• Comment to @Ezlev and Silver seren: I don't know if y'all saw the previous discussion at Template:Did you know nominations/Cartographers (board game), but isn't this similarly an in-universe hook? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she?) 04:27, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

• I always took the "no in universe hooks" to mean no in-plot jokes that are only relevant or understandable to those who know the work? A hook that is explicitly a description of the plot doesn't have that problem. Silverseren^C 04:51, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
• leek, I agree with Silver seren, but if there's any concern, swapping "main character" with "player" would make it a description of gameplay rather than plot. ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 05:21, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Okay, throwing in some new ALTs per Wikipedia talk:Did you know#Another one:

• ALT2: ... that according to critics, Fortune-499 is "an effective story of capitalist humdrum" that involves "witchcraft, mid-20s malaise, and puns"? Source: first quote, second quote
• ALT3: ... that Fortune-499 is a card-based, turn-based, chance-based, role-playing rock paper scissors game? Source: [2]

Pinging Silver seren – willing to review these new ones? ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 22:23, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

• I don't think I'm allowed to re-review after the first time. Usually when that happens, someone else has to do it. But, if it's allowed, then on ALT2. Silverseren^C 22:34, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

In response to the above question, yes reviewers are allowed to re-review articles and hooks provided that they didn't propose completely new hook facts themselves or significantly contribute to the article during their review. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 22:36, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

ALT2 to T:DYK/P4