Talk:Foreign relations of Abkhazia
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
POV
editalternative viewpoints pr WP:YESPOV are missing in this article. Internationally Abkhazia is still considered part of the Republic of Georgia.--Termer (talk) 04:33, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
Relations with other self-declared independent states
editNeed citations, as no references or evidences are provided. Regards.--HCPUNXKID (talk) 09:57, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
Palestinian Authority
editCurrently it is written "The Palestinian Authority also welcomed the independence of both Abkhazia and South Ossetia", but here it is written "The militant Palestinian organization Hamas also welcomed the recognition of both Abkhazia and South Ossetia." - both without sources. So which of these two is true (or both or neither)? Alinor (talk) 08:35, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
Map
editPlease somebody actualize map. Jan CZ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jan CZ (talk • contribs) 12:39, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
Tuvalu takes back recognition of independence of Abkhazia and so-called South Ossetia
editTuvalu has taken back recognition of independence of Abkhazia. Please see tha link: http://www.interpressnews.ge/en/politicss/56198-tuvalu-takes-back-recognition-of-independence-of-abkhazia-and-so-called-south-ossetia.html Articel needs to be corrected! --D.Goletiani (talk) 09:21, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Foreign relations of Abkhazia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080901204601/http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/detaylar.do?load=detay&link=151456&bolum=102 to http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/detaylar.do?load=detay&link=151456&bolum=102
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:31, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Written like an advertisement
editThe "International economic relations" section of this article sounds like an advertisement. However, this section is only very brief. It could probably be deleted in order to solve the problem (I can't see what purpose it actually serves anyway). Jargo Nautilus (talk) 06:25, 25 October 2022 (UTC)