Talk:Fat Lever

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Bagumba in topic Article title

Article title edit

WP:COMMONNAME says

Wikipedia does not necessarily use the subject's "official" name as an article title; it generally prefers to use the name that is most frequently used to refer to the subject in English-language reliable sources.

While there are certainly usage examples of Lafayette Lever and Lafayette "Fat" Lever, Fat Lever appears to conform with WP:COMMONNAME and therefore this article should be renamed. UW Dawgs (talk) 14:29, 11 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

  • I have restored the page to "Fat Lever", as it's the longstanding consensus title. If a move to a new title is warranted, it should come after discussion, as per WP:RM. —C.Fred (talk) 01:45, 12 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
    • Thanks, Fred. I wish I had more carefully reviewed the article history to see that @The rakish fellow: had twice moved it to Lafayette Lever without initiating any discussion, before "researching" the Fat Lever rationale which appears to be obvious and non-controversial. UW Dawgs (talk) 03:34, 12 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Should the article explain the origin of the nickname? Davidkasdan (talk) 00:47, 22 May 2021 (UTC)davidkasdanReply

@Davidkasdan: That would make sense to mention in the early life section (if we had one)—and if there are reliable sources for the origin. —C.Fred (talk) 00:59, 22 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Davidkasdan: I added it. Feel free to be bold and improve articles too. Regards.—Bagumba (talk) 07:09, 22 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fat Lever. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:23, 28 September 2017 (UTC)Reply