Talk:Ethnic groups in South Africa

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Aidan9382 in topic Protected edit request on 15 October 2022

Race/racial groups edit

I don't believe it is correct to use the words race or racial in this article, and it is unsourced. Where does Stats SA "define" any groups, let alone "racial groups"? The Census 2011 household questionnaire only lists "population groups", asking in respect of each household member "How would (name) describe him/herself in terms of population group?". HelenOnline 06:57, 25 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Copy-edited with source. HelenOnline 20:45, 25 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
South Africa prides itself as the "rainbow nation", but the dark legacy of bygone Apartheid continues to impact the nation. 75-80% Black natives (including upwards to 5 million Sub-Saharan African immigrants, and Bushmen in the Northern Cape whose history predate the Bantus), 10-15% white Europeans (the majority being Afrikaners- Dutch/Flemish and German Protestant with some French Huguenot ancestry, but other European ethnic groups like Germans, Portuguese, Italians, Greeks, Croats, Poles and over 150,000 Jews), mixed-race Cape Coloureds and 5% Asians (Indians/South Asians, as well Chinese, Malays, Indonesians, and Arabs from Southwest Asia; and in smaller numbers Filipinos, Japanese, Koreans and Vietnamese). South Africa has a minuscule number of Chileans from South America, and Polynesian Maori from New Zealand which like India is historically part of the global British empire, and South Africa is part of the Anglophone world (Over 2 million English, with Scottish, Welsh and Irish descendants-Eire or Republic of Ireland formerly part of the UK). South Africa did not include Botswana and Zimbabwe (formerly Rhodesia) nor the enclave Lesotho and Swaziland which are African tribal kingdoms, but briefly ruled Namibia, 1918-90. 67.49.89.214 (talk) 19:38, 26 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Is this article necessary? edit

Please see WPSA discussion. HelenOnline 07:48, 25 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ethnic groups in South Africa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:43, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

User:Untrammeled's edits edit

This user, without any reliable sources whatsoever insists on removing all references to "Black South Africans" from the articles and wishes to replace them with "Indigenous South Africans".

Bantu expansion is a well documented historical event that debunks this bogus proposition. The Khoisan, who are the actual indigenous nation of Southern Africa, are as unrelated to the Bantu peoples as the Indo-Aryans are to the Dravidians.

Moreover it's clear that this user is simply here to push a black supremacist race agenda, have a look at how they vandalised the Jan van Riebeek page. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jan_van_Riebeeck&type=revision&diff=874963265&oldid=874574734

This is clearly not the behaviour of someone who is here to build an encyclopaedia based on reliable sources. @Francoisdjvr and Untrammeled: --Spirit of the night (talk) 14:08, 5 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

User:Spirit of the night edit

My edits to the article follows protocol of Wikipedia and the valid sources of the information about South Africa's official understand, the contribution set by me are to elaborate clarity and fact, there's no agenda to vandalize good work but add on to its affect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Untrammeled (talkcontribs) 05:35, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ethnic groups in South Africa editors edit

Please do your your own satisfying but full research before using emotions to dispute the article at hand. Untrammeled (talk) 05:42, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

What is there to discuss? edit

Wikiacc there's nothing to discuss, they are African, they mark their bank or any other information section as 'African' yes it i one of their race box name they mark, that's their accepted ethnicity or understanding as they are ever since they made themselves clear, putting South African in brackets next to it is to dispel confusion from the other Africans reading this article who are not of South Africa. So this isn't really meant for any real discussion, it's a common name everywhere that black people of South Africa rake themselves as Africans who are called by Americans 'Black', the rest of the world call African. It's been used as so ever since, mending it to any form is just requesting deprivation and limiting not in their interest. Untrammeled (talk) 22:55, 9 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

First, if someone disagrees with you, there's automatically something to discuss. (WP:ENGAGE is the page to read here.) Second, why does Statistics South Africa use "Black African" then? Wikiacc () 22:59, 9 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
The text of the article uses "Black South African". The map legend needs to match the language used in the article. However, the article itself claims that Statistics South Africa uses the classification "Black". We really should be using the terms that the actual census used. --Khajidha (talk) 01:27, 10 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ethnic vs Racial edit

I believe the title of this article should be "Racial Groups of South Africa", as these groupings are quite obviously racial and not ethnic. This would suggest that all South Africans of the same race share a culture, which is not true. CapingThroughTheBlue (talk) 06:57, 1 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

I concur. Pedalsnake (talk) 09:20, 16 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Protected edit request on 15 October 2022 edit

Could someone please revert these two revisions?

Thanks! --IanDBeacon (talk) 20:01, 15 October 2022 (UTC) IanDBeacon (talk) 20:01, 15 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

@IanDBeacon:   Not done: The page's protection level has changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. Aidan9382 (talk) 05:54, 20 October 2022 (UTC)Reply