Fancruft edit
As much as I love Spelunky, is this article really meaningful to anyone other than fans? widgethocker (talk) 21:50, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- I agree the article is quite niche, but I think it pretty handily meets the WP:GNG i.e. "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". The cited sources are clearly significant, independent, direct coverage, and at least Polygon is considered notable (per WP:RSP) and I would say several others are too. For one to improve the article, I think it would help to clarify some of the language and trim out some of the chafe. Or, one could begin merging this content into a new section in the Spelunky article. (Right now, the run is only mentioned in passing in the Reception section.) Just because it _can_ be its own article doesn't mean it needs to be. Suriname0 (talk) 18:46, 6 May 2021 (UTC)