This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dream (YouTuber) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days ![]() |
![]() | Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments, look in the archives, and review the FAQ before commenting. |
![]() | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Dream (YouTuber). Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Dream (YouTuber) at the Reference desk. |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Q1: Can we use a photo of Dream from the face reveal video?
A1: Unless a photo of Dream is released under a free license, no. Q2: Why doesn't X YouTuber/Twitch Streamer have an article about them?
A2: If they are notable enough to warrant inclusion on Wikipedia, then you are welcome to make one. If you need help, the Teahouse is a good place to start. Q3: Why are the allegations of Dream's sexual misconduct towards minors not mentioned?
A3: Because they are very contentious statements that need to be covered by sources Wikipedia considers reliable, and currently, no such sources have covered it. These types of statements should be taken with care (or removed if poorly sourced or not sourced at all), especially in a biography article like this one. See the policy for contentious statements in Wikipedia biographies. |
![]() | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Semi-protected edit request on 17 May 2024
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Theprook (talk) 01:14, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Quiero editar La Página
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 01:18, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Name change
editCurrently, "Dream"s real name is written in the article as "Clay". I think this should be updated to his full name which is "Clayton Ray Huff". Over here is his linkedin page confirming his identity: [1]https://www.linkedin.com/in/clayton-ray-huff-1a5425289/
Editor comments say that the name should not be changed without user consensus, and I think it's about time the name gets updated. Are there any reasons not to change his name? Googoogootoo (talk) 10:21, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- there's no evidence this linkedin is legit. Only has a handful of followers. Seems like something that could be easily faked. Hemiauchenia (talk) 20:43, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
I love your videos 2604:3DC0:0:2439:C73:D13E:D40:6643 (talk) 17:10, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Add sexual misconduct allegations to controversy tab
editI know FAQ says otherwise there is reliable source talking about sexual misconduct against Amanda sillygirly97 (talk) 18:52, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- Okay? I wonder if the article must mention it, though. Some consensus could be seeked to see if it would make the article more interesting to be read. CarlFilip19 (talk) 18:29, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- WP:VG/RS considers it a "situational" source, and given that this is a sensitive BLP issue I would avoid including it. Hemiauchenia (talk) 23:38, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- Good point. Whenever a controversy happens, I find it a good idea to wait a long time so that reliable sources have time to describe it fairly and in detail. It would be bad to make a knee-jerk edit with any source to update an article for latest news. CarlFilip19 (talk) 11:01, 8 August 2024 (UTC)