Talk:Don't Panic (Coldplay song)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   Well written, but I have a small concern; the second sentence in the lead says, "…the earliest known prototype of the song existed way back in 1998…"; "way back" seems redundant.

   Removed as suggested. --Efe (talk) 01:00, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Source number thirteen is a forum, thus not making it a reliable source. Under 'Release and reception', the first three lines are unsourced.

   You mean the third paragraph? --Efe (talk) 01:02, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

   Yes, so sorry for leaving that out, I must have forgotten. DiverseMentality 01:07, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

   Its fine. Its easy to spot what you are referring to since majority of the section is sourced. The forum has been removed, and I'm still looking for the sources of these three lines. --Efe (talk) 01:25, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

   Done, although I hid one line in the article; potential good source is not accessible at this time. --Efe (talk) 02:00, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Stays focused.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Under 'Release and reception', it says, "it was on the popular Garden State soundtrack". Words like "popular" should be avoided.

   Removed as suggested. --Efe (talk) 01:00, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

   Article is stable.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   All good.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   I am placing the article on hold for seven days to allow for the above concerns to be addressed. DiverseMentality 23:13, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

   I think I have addressed all you concern Diverse. Please recheck and thanks for the review. --Efe (talk) 02:00, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

   All concerns have been addressed, I'm passing the article. Good work! DiverseMentality 02:05, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

   Thank you. --Efe (talk) 02:12, 27 November 2008 (UTC)