Talk:Dhadakebaaz
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dhadakebaaz article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Add theatrical poster of this film
editThere are lots of poster online of this film. If you can add a poster to better understand of the reader and for thumbnail. Research Voltas (talk) 06:10, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- If you can find a copy of the film poster online, then it might be possible for you to WP:UPLOAD it yourself as non-free content and use in accordance with WP:FILMNFI and WP:NFCC. Most film posters tend to still be protected by copyright, a poster from a film released in 1990 is almost certain still protected as such. If you're not sure about the copyright status of the image you want to use, you can ask for help at Wikimedia:Media copyright questions. If you're not sure how to upload a non-free file, you can ask for help at Wikipedia:Files for upload. As for other possible images which might be used in the article, this will probably be quite hard to justify per WP:NFCCP; so, most likely only images which are free from copyright are going to be OK to uploaded outside of a poster for the main infobox. If you have any specific questions about writing articles about films, try asking on the talk pages of the WikiProjects listed at the top of this page because that's where you're likely going to find editors familiar with this genre of article. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:14, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- You can download this film's poster from Amazon.uk/Dhadakebaaz. There no © sign on poster. So possible it is © free. Research Voltas (talk) 13:39, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- You can download the film's poster if you want to try and upload it yourself or you can ask someone at WP:FFU to do it for you if you don't want to do it yourself; however, the fact that there's no copyright notice on it doesn't automatically mean it's not copyrighted in either the United States or India because of the URAA and Wikipedia:Non-U.S. copyrights. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:52, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- It's a DVD poster and its in public domain. So can we use at WP. Research Voltas (talk) 15:36, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Being publically available online and being in the public domain are not one and the same, and it seems highly unlikely that a film poster from 1990 is going to be within the public domain. You can find lots of DVD covers, book covers, album covers, etc. available online which can be downloaded free of charge, but most are still protected by copyright and aren't in the public domain. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:39, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Research Voltas: Do you know whether this is the correct poster for the film? -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:33, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- I think that poster is made by some one and its not a official poster. But this cover looks authentic https://www.google.com/search?q=dhadakebaaz&oq=Dhadakebaaz&aqs=chrome.0.69i59j46j69i61j69i60l2.3184j0j7&client=ms-android-oppo&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8#imgrc=YzVQNBM2zT3sCM Research Voltas (talk) 05:52, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- But this poster is from prominent newspaper website's looking reliable and have entire star cast of the film. [1] you can upload it. Research Voltas (talk) 05:56, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- The first link you provided is just to a page of Google search results and that page contains a number of images and articles about the film. The second link is a bit better, but the image isn't very clean. Can you provide a more specific link that shows a cleaner version of the poster? If you can find such a link, then you can download the file to your computer and then upload it to Wikipedia as non-free content using WP:UPLOAD. Finally, please start WP:INDENTING your talk page posts since it doing so will make it much easier to for others to follow along with the discussion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:59, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- It's a DVD poster and its in public domain. So can we use at WP. Research Voltas (talk) 15:36, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- You can download the film's poster if you want to try and upload it yourself or you can ask someone at WP:FFU to do it for you if you don't want to do it yourself; however, the fact that there's no copyright notice on it doesn't automatically mean it's not copyrighted in either the United States or India because of the URAA and Wikipedia:Non-U.S. copyrights. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:52, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- You can download this film's poster from Amazon.uk/Dhadakebaaz. There no © sign on poster. So possible it is © free. Research Voltas (talk) 13:39, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Why this article in in irrelevant category ?
editFor the folks from USA this article may be irrelevant but for the movie buff's of Maharashtra is very important.This film is very popular in Maharashtra.This film is on TV for two to three times per week. You can search on Google. Research Voltas (talk) 15:48, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Research Voltas: I don't know which category you refer to but with a few exceptions, articles should generally only be in the most specific categories which apply. For example, we have around 140,000 articles about specific films and none of them are in Category:Film. I made dozens of copy-edit improvements in [1] but you reverted most of them in the next edit [2]. Maybe you edited the version before me and didn't notice you were overwriting my edit. Please be careful about that. Others have since made similar edits to me. You were a bit rude in [3]. Editors are allowed to tag articles for improvement. We have six million articles and millions of them have problems. There is no obligation to fix every problem you see. When I actually spent time fixing many problems instead of tagging the article, you reverted my work, so it seems Shushugah did the smart thing. PrimeHunter (talk) 22:58, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
I didn't reverted any changes. Infact I welcome constructive improvements. I think you and me was editing at the same and tried to submit changes simultaneously , that's why this problem happened. Research Voltas (talk) 04:21, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Marathi sources
edit@Research Voltas: There are two Marathi sources cited in the article. It's OK to cite non-English sources as long as the source itself is considered reliable; however, as explained in WP:NOTENG, it's best to try and provide as much information about the source in English since this is after all English Wikipedia.
The two sources are as follows.
- https://www.loksatta.com/manoranjan-news/mahesh-kothare-film-dhadakebaaz-fame-kauthya-mahakal-role-ssj-93-2008414/
- https://divyamarathi.bhaskar.com/news/bipin-varti-play-kauthya-mahakal-in-mahesh-kothares-film-dhadakebaaz-126007616.html
Since you added the sources, I'm assuming you can read Marathi. Could you please provide an English translation of the titles of the two articles, a transliteration of the original Marathi titles (if possible) and the names of the author(s) who wrote the two articles (if possible)? If you can add that information to this discussion thread, then I or another editor can add it to the citation templates for the two sources. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:29, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- 1. Title - ' Eight different actors played the character of Kawatya Mahakal '
- Writer - Loksatta online.
- 2. Title - 'Not one or two but 8 different actors portrayed the character of Kawatya Mahakal in 'Dhadakebaaz'
- Writer - Entertainment desk (Divya Marathi).
- Research Voltas (talk) 05:39, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- All these sources are reliable b'cause they're websites of leading Marathi newspapers in Maharashtra. Research Voltas (talk) 05:41, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for that information. Can you provide a transliteration for the orginal Marathi titles? By transliteration, I mean writing out the Marathi titles using the Latin alphabet (i.e. the English alphabet). -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:46, 16 March 2021 (UTC)