s_responding_on_articles_talk_pages|No editor is responding on articles talk pages]]}}.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 18 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

|}

A#Inappropriate uses of alternative accounts|illegitimate]] reasons', and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- RoySmith (talk) 22:14, 19 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

{{unblock | Hello , I understand why I been blocked by admin. Some errors happened form my side but my intentions was good. I was new to this website. And because of not understanding the website and not reading notices I did same mistake again. Initially I never read any links givet by admin because I was so nive to this website. I didn't knew it's rule of work. I want request to give me a opportunity. I will never do these mistakes again. Research Voltas (talk) 17:03, 1 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Research Voltas (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello , I understand why I been blocked by admin. Some errors happened form my side but my intentions was good. I was new to this website. And because of not understanding the website and not reading notices I did same mistake again. Initially I never read any links givet by admin because I was so nive to this website. I didn't knew it's rule of work.I was a rookie. I want request to give me a opportunity. I will never do these mistakes again. I accept my mistakes. I was naive, not having adequate knowledge I did all this. But now many folks calling me sock master or sock puppet its feeling so bad I can't tell you in words. Please stop calling this and using my name everywhere. I am a law-abiding boy. I don't like to break rules. Previously I broken rules because I wasn't aware of these rules. You know it takes time to know about rules of some new place when you reach their. I am a educated, responsible person. I hate violence, disruption, corruption and unlawful activities. I am a nature lover. I love trees, animals, chemistry, Botany and Zoology. Whoever reading this place do mercy and don't do this, I pledge to obey WP rules. Revoke my block

Decline reason:

Please request unblock from your original account. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 05:43, 2 April 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Research Voltas (talk) 05:04, 2 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

User:Jpgordon Thanks for informing. I wasn't aware of that. You know I'm from a third world country. Don't have proper knowledge. I'll request from my original account. Thanks brother Research Voltas (talk) 05:50, 2 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Unblock edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Research Voltas (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I don't know what are talking about. I am not that user your saying.WP protect privacy of editors by allowing them by anonymous and with different names than actual.I didn't did any vandalism or copyright breach.There is mistake happened from my side.I am a editor with good intentions.I think knowledge must be free and accessable to everyone from the society. I am not that user and someone just accusing me and blocking me on just bare suspecting it's not good. If I am done something wrong , you have to give me a chance to prove my self. I am worth it to be a respectable WP user. I know what are the rules and regulations of WP. You can check my edits , I ain't did any wrongdoing, no fake edits, no Vandalism. I contribute in the articles with proper citations and providing references. I am a Science PG student. I know my limitations. The end result in your hand . This is my request to unblock meResearch Voltas (talk) 05:16, 20 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You may use within reason whatever individualistic username you wish, but you may not use more than one. You will need to tell us why your edits are similar to those of the other account at issue. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:21, 20 March 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


User:GreaterPonce665 Don't use such language. We are from same same state Maharashtra. I am a proud Maratha I don't want to hear rubbish. I don't want to edit WP. Research Voltas (talk) 06:03, 2 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Shirsada Hanuman Temple edit

 

The article Shirsada Hanuman Temple has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't pass WP:GNG. Created by a sock, and should be deleted per WP:BMB.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GreaterPonce665 (TALK) 21:56, 26 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

User:GreaterPonce665 please stop this. We are from same state, we are Hindu. You mentioned on your user page that you're from Maharashtra. That means we are brothers. We both respect Shivaji , so stop calling sock master, sock puppet. Show some mercy on me. I am a poor boy from a poor village of Maharashtra. Your this world is a big ocean and I'm a little organism of it. If you don't want me on WP. I leave this website from this moment. I know all this articles on your watchlist. My intended never was to vandalise or disrupt anything here. My account was blocked but my IP wasn't but still you undo , edits done by me. You never once studied, is what I did something wrong. Your experienced , probably know more than me. But harassing some by mentioning his name and saying sock puppet, sock master is not good. Your behaviour hurting ne so bad I can't tell in the world. I feelings very sad by your attack on me. You undid my all the edits. But that's not what is hurting more to me is that, we're from same state you gone to America and from their your calling incompetent, not have competence is hurt me a lot, Your words made me depressed. I beg you to don't attack me. Research Voltas (talk) 05:31, 2 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi Kundan, please stop pinging me. Please note that editing in any way (i.e. IP) is wrong when your accounts are banned for socking. Calling into into question your English competency is not a knock on you personally; you don't have to know English to be a good person. (It is important however that WP content be free of error). As far as being from Maharashtra, I don't particularly follow your opinions about the culture. I would suggest you stop editing WP and take a break for sake of your own mental health. GreaterPonce665 (TALK) 15:09, 2 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

W edit

W Research Voltas (talk) 16:50, 1 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

User  : AARYA SANJAYAN edit

Your thing are total vandalism. Your just trying to bully me. User: AARYA SANJAYAN your edit on Muktainagar is totally wrong. You said possibility of vandalism without looking the article. You did edit former President Pratibha Patil started her political career from Muktainagar , which is wrong she started her political career from Jalgaon town she elected first time from Jalgaon Vidhansabha constituency and she second time got elected from Muktainagar. Don't try to bully me. Your a disgraceful lady. Don't try to attack. Do your work. Research Voltas (talk) 16:56, 1 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Behaviour edit

Hello User : AARYA SAJAYAN we both are belong to same religion. We have to behave in good way to eachother. I am sorry in I hurt your feelings. I read somewhere on Teahouse that your a girl. So once again if I ever hurt your feelings. I don't want to fight with you. So stop doin this and be fr. I like Kerala and it's peoples. Specially after watcy Drishyam 2 I became fan of your states films and Mohanlal sir and know one can forget Priya Wariar is also from your sate. So don't be mad and be friends. We don't want fight between people of Kerala and Maharashtra. Research Voltas (talk) 17:11, 1 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

I'm also sorry for being rude. AARYA SAJAYAN (talk) 03:13, 2 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

User : AARYA SANJAYAN Its ok,You also accept my sorry. lets be good friends. Research Voltas (talk) 04:41, 2 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Tweak edit

User:GreaterPonce665 Mistakingly User : AARYA SAJAYAN reverted my edits from Muktainagar article. Aarya is a nice girl but I think she didn't studied article before doin omitting referenced info. @GreaterPonce665: it's also for you. My account is blocked that's not mean you should revert edits done by me without logging to that account. You have to read the conversation between my friend @AARYA SAJAYAN: and other man. You deleted lods of ref edits. Research Voltas (talk) 08:34, 2 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Muktabai Temple edit

 

The article Muktabai Temple has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article created by a blocked sock of User:Research_Voltas. Should be deleted per WP:BMB.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GreaterPonce665 (TALK) 21:38, 31 July 2021 (UTC)Reply