Talk:Dean Dixon

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Opus 113 in topic Image copyright status

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dean Dixon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:42, 21 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright status edit

User:2600:1700:75d0:9ff0:6d92:f8a2:41b9:70a3 removed File:Dean Dixon (1941).jpg from this article with an edit summary suggesting that they thought the image was copyrighted. I'm not sure why - the file description is pretty clear about this image being in the public domain. I've asked the user for more information on their talk page, and in the meantime I'm going to add the other image we seem to have of Dixon. Does anyone else have information about the copyright status of the 1941 image? If not, my sense is that it would be reasonable to restore it, and maybe to have both images in the article with the 1941 image as the lead one. --Opus 113 (talk) 07:29, 1 March 2021 (UTC)Reply