Talk:Dadaglobe/Archive 1
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Query
Why does this page keep getting kicked back to the "submitted one day ago" when the submission dates are listed as 18 and 19 January? I have continued to make minor edits, but I didn't think that this would change the submission date. Since an aspect of this entry is very timely (related exhibition to open shortly), I am anxious to get it reviewed and make any necessary edits. Any guidance on this matter would be very much appreciated. Gaw54 (talk) 16:49, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
- There appears to be something missing from this paragraph:
Some of Dada's most iconic artworks were created in direct response to the Dadaglobe solicitation letter: Ernst's Chinese Nightengale, These works were conceived by the artists with their presentation in reproduction foremost in mind. Dadaglobe was to have been a manifesto on the revised status of the artwork in reproduction.
- Also, it would be beneficial to the reader if images and quotes from the original unpublished document were added to the article. Coldcreation (talk) 21:54, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
- I see the paragraph has been fixed. Nice. Not sure, however, what this is supposed to mean: "Dadaglobe was to have been a manifesto on the revised status of the artwork in reproduction." This sentence has no reference, so I could not directly seek out the meaning of "revised status of the artwork in reproduction". Perhaps this should be elaborated upon with a citation added for clarity. Coldcreation (talk) 11:41, 24 January 2016 (UTC)