Talk:Courageous-class aircraft carrier/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Sturmvogel 66 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:36, 19 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

Comments

  1. Problems with the introduction. It is supposed to be a summary of the article. And the main article tag is for a summary of another article. Could you move it and other information about their careers as battlecruisers into a short first section with the main tag (this article's fine introduction could be lifted for the purpose) and redo the introduction as a summary of the article. It would be nice if it could also mention some of the "firsts" achieved by these notable ships.
  2. The second paragraph in the Conversions section is way longer than any of the other paragraphs in the article. Could it be broken up?
  3. There is no ALT text on the images. (I'll pass it without them but hey)

Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:03, 19 July 2010 (UTC)Reply