Talk:Count Duckula

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled edit

No mention of Gormenghast! Danceswithzerglings (talk) 13:39, 23 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Theme Song edit

Should the theme song, end theme, and shortened end theme be added?


Copyright.


To Nanny,she refers to the slinged arm as "me bad arm" and let's things fall,when she hold's them in it. New Babylon


///In episode 11, season 3 - it is made clear that Igor is a Vampire. When he replaces the non vampire bat with a vampire bat he says 'And soon he too will be a vampire like me<insert laughter>". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.198.5.186 (talk) 13:27, 30 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

He actually says 'He like thee will be a vampire'. Igorth is quite likely to be a seperate character from Igor anyway, but it isn't made explicitly clear, probably on purpose. Igor himself is NOT a vampire despite apparently enjoying blood. Granitoons (talk) 15:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

///Slight problem with the above, in the episode "Ghostly Gold" in the bar scene Nanny and Igor can both be seen clearly in the mirror's reflection whilst the ghost and Duckula can not. It is explained that Duckula can not be seen as he is a vampire.92.237.4.111 (talk) 19:30, 17 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Igor edit

But on a note to Igor,in "In the Arctic cirles" ,when he's firred,he sob's "dismised, after seven and a half centuries of faithfull servitude". New Babylon

Currently, the page says that Igor's age is uncertain. That may be, but his time of service is not. One of the last episodes of season one gives an exact number (seven hundred forty-something? I think it's the one where Duckula tries to make money by having Igor and Nanny work somewhere else). Also, in the family reunion episode, he states that this will be his eighth family reunion, not that he's been around for eight hundred years. That is consistent with a length of time between seven and eight hundred years. Mrkwcz (talk) 19:48, 28 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
But wait, he said that he has been to 8 of the vampires reunions that happen every cenutry, meaning he has to be over 800 years old. -Golem866 (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
If that's his eighth, he's been to seven previous ones, i.e. his first was seven hundred years ago. Which is consistent with seven hundred and fifty years of service. We don't know how old he was when he first came to work for the Duckulas, though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.135.40.178 (talk) 09:45, 14 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Series edit

Can someone confirm that the 'third' series (at least in DVD release) is actually third+fourth..? i.e. The lead section says that three series have been released in the UK, "meaning all 65 episodes" whereas everywhere else says that the 65 episodes equate to four series.

A relatively minor point, but an important clarification to make. ntnon (talk) 17:19, 11 October 2008 (UTC)Reply


6 episodes including "Manhattan duck "A mountie always gets his duck" and "Venice a duck not a duck" were transmitted in the uk in 1993 completely seperately to the rest of the run. I belive this is down to them being left over after Thames Television lost their franchise at the end of 1992. These episodes can be classed as "Series 4" or as the rest of "Series 3"

ref The Guinness book of classic british T.V by Paul Cornell, Martin Day and Keith Topping Guinnness Publishing Ltd 1996

— Preceding unsigned comment added by NuNkLeNaGgEr3472 (talkcontribs) 20:11, 5 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Racism. edit

There should be a little remark about all the racist-joke stereotype characters from Austria, Russia, China, & France. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.19.236.142 (talk) 01:03, 20 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Stereotypes =/= racism. Granitoons (talk) 15:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nick edit

What does this have do with Nickelodeon? -Golem866 (talk)

Airing history edit

I was thinking, shouldn't the list be in an alphabetical order? I might even be better to have the UK at the top, since the show is originally from there, and the rest of the countries in an alphabetical order. - Siggi31 (talk) 22:19, 29 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Time in Count Duckula edit

Hi there. I've amended the main article to put the full standard description of time as given by Igor "Eastern transylvanian standard time" and also to make reference to the alternative description as given by Igor in the episode "Private Beak"- "Eastern standard transylvanian time".This can clearly be heard in the episode. I don't know if it was a mistake which wasn't noticed during recording or editing. But it's definitely the line as delivered. (NuNkLeNaGgEr3472 (talk) 20:01, 5 February 2011 (UTC))Reply

Usually he says the former, but the latter still makes grammatical sense. Granitoons (talk) 15:25, 24 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Are the Air Dates Correct? edit

I distinctly remember watching this show while living in San Francisco. I am pretty sure I was in the first grade. That would have made it about 1986. Try as I might though, every internet search turns up 1988. Does anyone else feel the way I do? Or am I just going crazy? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.158.178.102 (talk) 05:04, 24 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Someone seems to have reorganised the last 3rd of series one's airdates for some reason. Granitoons (talk) 15:26, 24 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Central Television edit

Can anyone give any vitiation that Duckula was co-produced by Central TV please? Last time I checked there was no mention of it all on the episodes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.5.90.205 (talk) 16:35, 5 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • To be made CLEAR: Central TV had Nothing do with the creation or production of this series, it was just a holding company to allow it to be broadcast on the ITV network. --Crazyseiko (talk) 16:57, 29 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

The state of this page edit

Just like Dangermouse, How on earth did this page get so poor? Its over detailed in some section yet there is NO History. This page is not good enough. --Crazyseiko (talk) 16:59, 29 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Count Duckula. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:00, 1 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Count Duckula. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:17, 13 August 2017 (UTC)Reply