Talk:Coseley

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Regarding Coseley's status edit

Although the local press and/or the local council may sometimes refer to Coseley as a town, is this really an accurate term? There is arguably no town 'centre'; what is there is hardly sufficient enough to be regarded as a town. And just because an area has a large residential population, does that automatically make it a 'town'? Some rural places have only a few thousand residents, but are called 'towns' because of the established infrastructure of the settlement makes it undeniably recognizable as a town. A place within a large urban conurbation will naturally have a large population, due to its proximity to other large towns and cities, but does that make the place itself a town? Coseley lacks a clear focal point, its commercial development is largely sporadic and interspersed with residences, and it is undeniable that the reason for its large population is down to its location between commercial centres such as Dudley and Wolverhampton; it's not like Coseley itself serves as a destination.

Although seemingly 'reliable' sources such as the local press and local authority may refer to it as a town, it is difficult to agree with that status, especially when there are clear instances of these sources being unreliable, or even biased. History may regard it as a town, but the face of the West Midlands, and indeed, Britain, has changed dramatically over the years; is it not possible that some place that was once regarded as a distinct entity could not have since been absorbed into a large agglomeration?

Wikipedia may be against 'original research', but sometimes it is difficult to determine facts from other sources alone, especially when said sources may be non-existent or few in number. LivingInMediocrity (talk) 22:52, 21 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Coseley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:26, 13 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Coseley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:21, 1 December 2017 (UTC)Reply