Talk:Conquest of the Western Turks
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Taiping Tulip in topic GA Review
 | Conquest of the Western Turks has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: July 7, 2013. (Reviewed version). |
 | Conquest of the Western Turks received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
 | A fact from Conquest of the Western Turks appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 July 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Conquest of the Western Turks/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: QatarStarsLeague (talk · contribs) 05:23, 3 July 2013 (UTC) Immensely intriguing article. Review will begin in a short while. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 05:23, 3 July 2013 (UTC)\
Lead and Infobox edit
Western Tujue should be emboldened also.
Background edit
Fine here.
Campaign edit
Pass.
Aftermath edit
Interesting fact about paper making! Anyway, this section passes.
Conclusion edit
Excellent article! Only one issue. When is is allayed, the article will pass. Congratulations! QatarStarsLeague (talk) 00:09, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
- I have done so. The article passes. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 20:51, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for the review!--Taiping Tulip (talk) 03:50, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
- I have done so. The article passes. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 20:51, 7 July 2013 (UTC)