Talk:Codman Carriage House and Stable/GA1
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Kieran207 (talk · contribs) 22:43, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I will be reviewing this article. I plan on this review taking 1-3 days for me. Thanks---Kieran207(talk-Contribs) 22:43, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- ALSO:Unless otherwise stated, a Pass within the section denotes a passing of that specific criteria, not the full passing of the article.--Kieran207(talk-Contribs) 23:56, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Well Written edit
- The article is well written, Compliant with WP:MOS and is very concise. I give this category a Pass.
Verifiable with no Original Research edit
- A thorough look at the reference list shows zero WP:SPS, so that's good. All information presented in the prose is in fact verified by a WP:RS. No original research was seen in the article. No plagiarism as far as I can see. Quotes are attributed, everything is cited, I give this category a Pass.
Broad in it's coverage edit
The main aspects of the topic are properly adressed. It stays focused while giving a good amount of detail (Although not an innapropiate amount per the summary style). I give this category a Pass
Neutral edit
Due weight is given, no bias seen, Pass.
Stable edit
No edit warring or massive changes seen recently. The edit history does show some minor vandalism but it has been swiftly reverted. Pass.
Illustrated edit
Pictures of the building are shown where necessary. Properly illustrated, Pass.
Well good job! The article has passed, I will be closing this review shortly.--Kieran207(talk-Contribs) 23:56, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- Awesome, thank you very much. APK whisper in my ear 21:47, 11 March 2021 (UTC)