Talk:Codman Carriage House and Stable

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Parkwells in topic Use Codman's maiden name

Possible sources

edit



  • Permits, Evening Star, August 31, 1940
  • "Turning Tables", Phyllis C. Richman and Carole Sugarman, WaPo, February 8, 1981
  • Historic Preservation, Henry Fernandez, Newsletter - Dupont Circle Advisory Neighborhood Commission 2B, October 1995

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Codman Carriage House and Stable/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kieran207 (talk · contribs) 22:43, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I will be reviewing this article. I plan on this review taking 1-3 days for me. Thanks---Kieran207(talk-Contribs) 22:43, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

ALSO:Unless otherwise stated, a Pass within the section denotes a passing of that specific criteria, not the full passing of the article.--Kieran207(talk-Contribs) 23:56, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Well Written

edit
  • The article is well written, Compliant with WP:MOS and is very concise. I give this category a Pass.

Verifiable with no Original Research

edit
  • A thorough look at the reference list shows zero WP:SPS, so that's good. All information presented in the prose is in fact verified by a WP:RS. No original research was seen in the article. No plagiarism as far as I can see. Quotes are attributed, everything is cited, I give this category a Pass.

Broad in it's coverage

edit

The main aspects of the topic are properly adressed. It stays focused while giving a good amount of detail (Although not an innapropiate amount per the summary style). I give this category a Pass

Neutral

edit

Due weight is given, no bias seen, Pass.

Stable

edit

No edit warring or massive changes seen recently. The edit history does show some minor vandalism but it has been swiftly reverted. Pass.

Illustrated

edit

Pictures of the building are shown where necessary. Properly illustrated, Pass.

Well good job! The article has passed, I will be closing this review shortly.--Kieran207(talk-Contribs) 23:56, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Awesome, thank you very much. APK whisper in my ear 21:47, 11 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

GA review

edit

Thanks for participating in the GA drive, Kieran, but we don't give credit for short reviews which don't give any suggestions for improvement. Did you thoroughly evaluate the sources used for WP:RS? For example, this doesn't look like a reliable source to me. (t · c) buidhe 04:03, 11 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Use Codman's maiden name

edit

Given that Codman was a woman of great wealth and independence, and she commissioned and made the decisions about her home and this support building of stable and apartments by herself, I have changed references to her to use her maiden name through the period of these buildings. She made these decisions, as well as commissioning a house in Newport, nearly two decades before her marriage at age 69. Don't take away her own name and history. Parkwells (talk) 22:44, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply