Talk:Citizendium
Latest comment: 1 year ago by MarchOfTheGreyhounds in topic Recent status
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Citizendium article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 90 days ![]() |
![]() | Citizendium was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
![]() | This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Citizendium Statistics vs. Recent Changes pages
editI'd note that while https://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Special:Statistics , accessed today, shows zero active users in the last 30 days, Citizentium is not entirely dead; https://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Special:RecentChanges shows a few users are still editing the site as recently as today. Presumably their stats system is broken. — The Anome (talk) 13:09, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Recent status
editIs it really appropriate to add commentary about the site's recent status based on the primary source of Wikimedia's recent contributions page? I would argue no, so I am reverting this for now. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 02:28, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- Fine by me either way, but the Decline section already used a few like that (citing RC or site statistics), which isn't so unusual for sites that self-report stats. – SJ + 03:11, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- You certainly weren't the first to add this kind of content. I also see something similar was recently removed by @X-Editor (perhaps for the same reason? There was no edit summary). I think more similar content may need to be removed from the article. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 13:05, 21 August 2023 (UTC)