Talk:Charles Portal, 1st Viscount Portal of Hungerford

Fair use rationale for Image:Sikorski Portal Dyon 300.jpg

Image:Sikorski Portal Dyon 300.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:31, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Lord Mountbatten

" ... the youngest of the Chiefs of Staff until the arrival of Lord Mountbatten". Mountbatten was not a chief of staff during the Second World War. However he did become Supreme Allied Commander in South East Asia. Portal remained the youngest of the three service chiefs during the war.IXIA (talk) 07:52, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Agreed. Sentence now removed. Dormskirk (talk) 19:21, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charles Portal, 1st Viscount Portal of Hungerford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120306060522/http://www.wlu.ca/lcmsds/archives/search/dhh/80-89/87/87-89.doc to http://www.wlu.ca/lcmsds/archives/search/dhh/80-89/87/87-89.doc

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:27, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

I have a doubt on

He argued for the new approach on the basis of the huge increase in the size of the bomber force, which would carry out not just precision bombing but also indiscriminate area bombing by night of all German cities with populations exceeding 100,000.

The context suggests that this is an inversion of

He argued for the new approach on the basis of the huge increase in the size of the bomber force, which would carry out not just indiscriminate area bombing by night of all German cities with populations exceeding 100,000 but also precision bombing. 151.29.55.235 (talk) 09:38, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

We have too many award cats

The number of categories is excessive. Most of these awards are not defining to him as an individual.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:41, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

True, but they are legitimate and I cannot think of a good policy reason to remove them. If we deleted them and an editor was doing research into recipients of the Order of Merit (for example) to see what particular profession received the most number of awards (for example), the population would be missing one of its highly decorated recipients. I am happy to be persuaded by other views. Dormskirk (talk) 18:02, 20 December 2023 (UTC)