 | This article was nominated for deletion on April 3, 2016. The result of the discussion was delete. |
Sources edit
Hi @LonerXL, many of your cites cited are not reliable. Please use references with reputations for fact-checking and editorial accuracy, not minor blogs and sites maintained by hobbyists. I recommend using the video game reliable sources custom Google search and checking the list at WP:VG/RS. czar 01:01, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
- How are you doing, @Czar? I see and understand your point exactly. Ironically, I actually spent a decent amount of time using the Google Search engine, and due to the game's apparent lack of "internet popularity," (which is likely due to the game's poor mechanics & structuring) these links were tragically the best I could come up with. I am respectfully well-aware of some of the "wikirules" in regards to reliable source significance, but it is ironically Wikipedia's responsibility to make our fellow wiki-users (and people in general) around the world aware of the game's existence. With that said, is there any particular exception that could be utilized here, so that the article could still be preserved in some form or manner? If not, then I simply understand. And I definitely will not debate or contest the matter any further. Overall, I strongly thank you for your time and input.lonerxl
- Might I suggest looking for print sources then? The article was originally deleted because the extant online sources were subpar. I'd view them less as obscure "wikirules" and more as common sense: we can't do justice to this topic if we rely chiefly on primary and unreliable sources to write it. While WP is a general encyclopedia, there are other wikis that aggregate unsourced content (such as some that you've cited) if you'd like to move some of the information there. czar 12:59, 15 July 2018 (UTC)