Talk:Carlton Cole
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
WikiProject class rating
editThis article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 08:36, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
First spell or second spell?
editWith him signing a new contract today, his infobox has seen a new spell added and then removed several times. Rather than continue is this way wouldn't it be better to reach consensus on, one spell or two spells? The Premier League seem to think here it is a second.--Egghead06 (talk) 19:57, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
- As I understand it, there is consensus at WT:FOOTBALL which states that because he left the club and re-signed for them in the same transfer window, it is considered one spell. GiantSnowman 08:37, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- If it were the same transfer window, but it isn't. The window during which he left the club closed some weeks ago. As he's signing as a free agent outside any transfer window, I'd agree with the Premier League that it has to be a new spell. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 08:56, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- I agree with Struway2. West Ham submitted their 25-man squad at the beginning of September after the transfer window shut, so Cole joining now is in my opinion a second spell. Thanks, JMHamo (talk) 09:00, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Oh yeah, I'm an idiot. GiantSnowman 09:02, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- I'm also agreeing with Struway2 here. It reminds me a little of the two loan spells that Shane Ferguson has had at Birmingham, for example. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 11:31, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- Oh yeah, I'm an idiot. GiantSnowman 09:02, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- I agree with Struway2. West Ham submitted their 25-man squad at the beginning of September after the transfer window shut, so Cole joining now is in my opinion a second spell. Thanks, JMHamo (talk) 09:00, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- If it were the same transfer window, but it isn't. The window during which he left the club closed some weeks ago. As he's signing as a free agent outside any transfer window, I'd agree with the Premier League that it has to be a new spell. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 08:56, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Carlton Cole. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120104053205/http://www.whufc.com:80/articles/carlton-cole-west-ham_2228487_22296 to http://www.whufc.com/articles/carlton-cole-west-ham_2228487_22296
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:31, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
Indonesia
editWhatever has gone on in Indonesia we need some references which, as English speakers, we can actually verify. Most of us don't speak Indonesian and this is the English language Wikipedia.--Egghead06 (talk) 15:06, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Carlton Cole. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120121012954/http://www.whufc.com/articles/20120118/the-big-interview_2236884_2580709 to http://www.whufc.com/articles/20120118/the-big-interview_2236884_2580709
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150610153803/http://www.whufc.com/articles/20130522/cole-to-depart_2236884_3185338 to http://www.whufc.com/articles/20130522/cole-to-depart_2236884_3185338
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131016212442/http://www.whufc.com/articles/20131014/carlton-cole-returns_2236884_3494890 to http://www.whufc.com/articles/20131014/carlton-cole-returns_2236884_3494890
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160811125730/http://www.sacrepublicfc.com/news/2016/08/09/srfc-sign-carlton-cole to http://www.sacrepublicfc.com/news/2016/08/09/srfc-sign-carlton-cole
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:54, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Carlton Cole. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150529114339/http://origin-www.whufc.com/articles/carlton-cole-west-ham_2228487_22296 to http://origin-www.whufc.com/articles/carlton-cole-west-ham_2228487_22296
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:02, 29 December 2017 (UTC)