Good articleCarlos Mesa has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 17, 2022Good article nomineeListed
June 20, 2022Featured article candidateNot promoted
Current status: Good article

Untitled edit

I have added an NPOV notice because of some of the language used in this article. Terms such as, meager, ethnic Spanish-European élite minority, and plundered, do not denote a neutral point of view.

--Mb1000 01:29, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I removed meager because it is largely untrue — royalites in a standard U.S. contract between the producing company and the owner of mineral rights in a private setting (fee simple or mineral deed holder) calls for a 12.5% royalty. It is my understanding that this is pretty much standard generally. "Meager" is in the eye of the beholder, and in this case, probably not literaly true, although admittedly the Bolivian masses could be expected to care very little about how things are done elsewhere. We should also keep in mind that the proper term for the development of natual resources, partcularly hydrocarbon reserves, is exploitation, which sounds completely POV as well, even when it is not, in this context. Somehow I contemplate that what will happen now will eventually be attempts to exploit the gas by a governmental corporation which will result in less overall revenue than the 18% royalty from private businesses would have, unless there are some really great and really patriotic Bolivian petroleum engineers, a topic of which I have no knowledge. Rlquall 10:43, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Not necessarily. A state-owned corporation would still exploit the gas in cooperation with foreign enterprises. This is the way it is done in many countries in the ME and Venezuela. The important thing is that the state enterprise can demand better terms. -- Viajero | Talk 11:53, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Vandalism edit

There has been quite a bit of vandalism on this page. Maybe it should be semi-protected. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by DanielBeaver (talkcontribs) 05:34, 24 January 2007 (UTC).Reply

Current activities? edit

It would be great if there was a section detailing his life post-presidency. Wingedbeaver (talk) 21:47, 19 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Carlos Mesa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:24, 15 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Carlos Mesa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:42, 31 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Carlos Mesa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:23, 10 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Removing recent events from the lead edit

Because the body of the article only includes information up to 2005, I've removed anything that took place after 2005 from the lead. The lead is a summary of the body. Any new information should first be added to the body of the article (with the support of reliable sources) before the lead is changed. Red Rock Canyon (talk) 15:14, 12 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Bolivian spokesman before the ICJ - NPOV edit

"Leaving behind animosity" is a subjective declaration. If it is a quote he made, then it needs to be cited as a quote. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eshaparvathi (talkcontribs) 15:27, 28 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

OAS / CEPR / MIT edit

MIT specifically states that they want it clarified that this study was independent of MIT, that it should be referred to as a CEPR study and that MIT does not endorse it. MIT says that "while they are employees" the CEPR study they did was as independent contractors for CEPR. That is very specifically saying MIT does not want their name on this.[1]

The information about the "MIT" study, besides being wrong isn't really relevant to this page. That issue is better addressed on pages specific to the elections. Laella (talk) 10:13, 14 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

References

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:45, 30 June 2021 (UTC)Reply