Talk:Carl Au

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Vaticidalprophet in topic Did you know nomination

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Carl Au/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 21:34, 18 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:34, 18 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello again. I should be able to respond in reasonably time. Soaper1234 - talk 22:32, 18 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Some Dude From North Carolina: Due to some unforeseen computer issues, I've not been able to respond as quickly as I would have liked. However, I'll try to respond in the next couple of days. I also have a couple bits of information to add to the article, as well as the recommendations below. Soaper1234 - talk 22:46, 20 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Infobox and lead edit

  • Actual birthdate seems like a requirement for GA.
  • Add commas after "dancer" and Ostrich Boys.
  • "began" → "begun"

Early life edit

Career edit

Filmography edit

  • Knowing each role also feels like a requirement.
    • Is this in response to the Copperfield role? If so, it can be removed. Soaper1234 - talk 12:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Awards and nominations edit

  • Since there's only one award I would remove the "Work" column, at least for now.

References edit


Progress edit

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  

Did you know nomination edit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk) 14:19, 12 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Improved to Good Article status by Soaper1234 (talk). Self-nominated at 15:19, 21 March 2021 (UTC).Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited:   - The fact that Au was the inaugural recipient of the prize doesn't seem to be cited.
  • Interesting:  
QPQ: Done.

Overall:   Mostly looks good, just one issue. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 06:04, 3 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

  • Thank you for the review Mx. Granger. The best I can find to say it was the first ceremony is by using the source provided. When you hover over the SSSSPOTY tab, it lists all the ceremonies, with 2007 being the first. If you don't deem this good enough, I can reword the hook. Soaper1234 - talk 18:23, 4 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
  Thanks, that seems fine to me. I'll add that citation to the lead to satisfy the requirement that the hook be cited inline. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 18:25, 4 April 2021 (UTC)Reply