Talk:Neo-Byzantine architecture

Romania?

Constantin Brâncoveanu's page has the following excerpt: "In his religious and laic constructions, Brâncoveanu harmoniously combined in architecture the mural and sculptural painting, the local tradition, the Neo-Byzantine style and the innovative ideas of the Italian Renaissance, giving rise to Brâncovenesc style." Shouldn't there be a mention of this? 92.81.115.213 (talk) 17:06, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Untitled

Ghirlandajo, your point that there were too many images is well taken and I won't try to re-post them, but I strongly feel that the picture of the Alexander Nevsky Cathedral should be included, even if the number of pictures should remain two.136.160.174.71 05:04, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

OK, I arranged the most representative pictures into a small and nice gallery. I don't think the stub needs more, as long as it is a stub. --Ghirla ^-трёп- 07:13, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

I agree. It looks good.136.160.174.50 23:41, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

File:Basilica of St. Paul.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Basilica of St. Paul.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 07:05, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Requested move 17 November 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Per consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 00:56, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

---

Byzantine Revival architecture → Neo-Byzantine architecture – Per WP:COMMONNAME. More common in google scholar ([1] [2]) and also in ngrams ([3]). Note that for ngrams, a few results are for "Byzantine Revival, 780–842", not for an architectural topic. Unfortunately, ngrams search doesn't work for "Byzantine Revival architecture", either because there are very few results or some other issue. Vpab15 (talk) 22:53, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Google books returns 1500 vs 500 results in favour of the proposed title ([4] [5]). Vpab15 (talk) 22:57, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

• Support per nom. No such user (talk) 14:33, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.