Talk:Buddhist atomism

Buddhism Low‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Changing Links page edit

Hey Wiki masters: I changed the Buddhist atomism links. If you think that they indicate vanity in any way, I hope you remove them. I added them merely because the links seems a little sparse, but do what you think best.

"Aristotelian-style atomic theory" edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Since Aristotle rejected atomism, I'm a bit puzzled what the article means by an Aristotelian-style atomic theory. --SteveMcCluskey 02:22, 4 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Can you prove that Aristotle rejected atomism? I thought he accepted it, with his so-called minima? It is sort of hard to figure out what Aristotle wanted us to think. But aside from that, I agree with you that mention of Aristotle here in the contexts of the Buddhsts seems, well, not at all necessary and a needless stretch of non-comparison.

Why is there no such term in.... edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Google scholar...???

http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+buddhist+atomism&btnG=Search&lr=&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0

--222.67.204.113 (talk) 05:43, 4 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

A red link is associated with the following.... edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+Indian+atomism&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0

--222.67.204.113 (talk) 05:49, 4 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic