Talk:Brighton Forum/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jappalang (talk) 01:38, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Just a few (personal) niggles, but nothing serious to general comprehension.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

• "... of Brighton, part of the English city of Brighton and Hove."

  "Brighton .. Brighton ..." seems a bit repetitive.

• "... building, by two architect brothers from London ..."

  Make it more precise with "building, designed by two architect brothers from London ..."?

• "... has had three greatly different uses since its construction at the edge of Brighton parish in 1854:"

  Simply "has had three greatly different uses" to "was used for three vastly different purposes"?

• "... listed it at Grade II ...", "... was listed at Grade II by ..."

  Is it "at" or "as"? Perhaps, the question should be is Grade II an adjective (Grade II structure) or a noun?

  From Oxford Dictionary,

  • include or enter in a list:

    93 men were still listed as missing

  • [no object] (list at/for) be on a list of products at (a specified price):

    the bottom-of-the-line Mercedes lists for $52,050

Otherwise, fairly minor prose issues, so passing this as a GA. Jappalang (talk) 01:38, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.