Talk:Brian Wesbury

Comment

Need refs for those statements, Obviously notable, not written like an ad, & I wikified it further. and lack of refs is no reason for a speedy. Look, again, and if you dont agree, send it for AfD.

Hello! Actually, the reason I speedy-tagged was due to ad tone (advertising of the book seemed the main purpose of the article, and was very much a puff-piece on the guy himself too.) It looks a bit better, but those statements still need references. For all the guy's supposedly a bigshot, I can't find a thing that backs these up. Seraphimblade 00:34, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Notability is questionable, at least according to WP:PROF. Added notability tag. --CronopioFlotante (talk) 21:36, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

The article says that "obviously" Wesbury was early, but that isn't true. Every serious investor knows that investing isn't a matter of timing buying and selling, but an ongoing process of relentlessly investing (dollar-cost averaging) whether the markets are high or low or just stumbling along. A person who simply kept on investing through the Crash of 2008 would now, in 2015, have essentially doubled his equity investment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.49.20.187 (talk) 16:46, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Biography assessment rating comment

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Jreferee ^(Talk) 18:03, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Wesbury CNBC.jpg

Image:Wesbury CNBC.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 16:49, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Brian Wesbury. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130213091237/http://www.camillieconomics.com:80/docs/WSJ2002.html to http://www.camillieconomics.com/docs/WSJ2002.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070201023050/http://budget.senate.gov/democratic/testimony/2002/wesbury_hrng012902.pdf to http://budget.senate.gov/democratic/testimony/2002/wesbury_hrng012902.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130213091237/http://www.camillieconomics.com:80/docs/WSJ2002.html to http://www.camillieconomics.com/docs/WSJ2002.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:03, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Brian Wesbury. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140903081145/http://search1.bloomberg.com/search/?content_type=all&page=1&q=wesbury to http://search1.bloomberg.com/search/?content_type=all&page=1&q=wesbury
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140520040114/http://www.columbia.k12.mo.us/rbhs/alumni/hall%20of%20fame.htm to http://www.columbia.k12.mo.us/rbhs/alumni/hall%20of%20fame.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.camillieconomics.com/docs/WSJ2002.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.camillieconomics.com/docs/WSJ2002.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:39, 25 July 2017 (UTC)