Talk:Bracell Limited
Latest comment: 5 years ago by HawkEggz in topic Request for Edits
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 10 April 2019. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Request for Edits
edit | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. Per WP:NOTNEWS, WP:FUTURE, WP:CLOSEPARAPHRASE. |
Edit requests, as follows - HawkEggz (talk) 01:50, 25 April 2019 (UTC) :
- Lwarcel Celulose, formerly from the Lwart Group was acquired by Royal Golden Eagle (RGE) on Aug 31, 2018, and was announced to be managed under the RGE-managed Bracell group, which operates RGE’s cellulose businesses in Brazil. The Sao Paolo-based facility has a production capacity of 250,000 tonnes of pulp per annum.[1][2]
- On April 24, 2019, Bracell announced a R$7 billion investment to increase its total production capacity to 2 million tonnes by 2021.[3]
— Preceding unsigned comment added by HawkEggz (talk • contribs) 01:51, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
References
- ^ "RGE boosts pulp capacity with Lwarcel Celulose purchase". Tissue World Magazine. 20 September 2018. Retrieved 25 April 2019.
- ^ "Singapore group Royal Golden Eagle acquires Brazil's Lwarcel". Reuters. 23 May 2018. Retrieved 25 April 2019.
- ^ "RGE plans R$7bn expansion of dissolving pulp output in Brazil". Valor International. 24 April 2019. Retrieved 25 April 2019.
Reply 25-APR-2019
edit
Edit request declined
- The first claim appears to be a news story about an acquisition made by the subject's parent company, and the parent's intent to have this acquisition managed as a subsidiary of the subject company. The second claim appears to be an announcement by the subject company regarding a future, hoped-for increase to its own production capacity.
- The text of these claims is insufficiently paraphrased from the source material.
Regards, Spintendo 12:05, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Spintendo: How can these be better paraphrased then? Thanks - HawkEggz (talk) 02:07, 29 April 2019 (UTC)