Talk:Borophaginae

Date

Cynodictis article says they were around from 40 Ma but this article did state 32 Ma I changed it. Walking with Beasts also has them at 40Ma, can we get a review on this? Enlil Ninlil 21:51, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

In perusing the article on the Borophaginae, I found the fragment "A phylogenetic analysis using cladistic methods with Hesperocyoninae as an archaic group of canids, as the outgroup" being treated as a sentence. Not being able to even garner the intended meaning (this clade being outside my area of knowledge), I am loathe to change it. Could someone with some expertise please address this? Scalasaig (talk) 23:07, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Borophaginae/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

In perusing the article on the Borophaginae, I found the fragment "A phylogenetic analysis using cladistic methods with Hesperocyoninae as an archaic group of canids, as the outgroup" being treated as a sentence. Not being able to even garner the intended meaning (this clade being outside my area of knowledge), I am loathe to change it. Could someone with some expertise please address this? Scalasaig (talk) 22:59, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Last edited at 22:59, 27 April 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 10:05, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Borophaginae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060319035906/http://www.lioncrusher.com/family.asp?family=Canidae to http://www.lioncrusher.com/family.asp?family=Canidae

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:20, 23 July 2017 (UTC)