The subfamily Borophaginae is an extinct group of canids called "bone-crushing dogs" that were endemic to North America during the Oligocene to Pliocene and lived roughly 36—2.5 million years ago and existing for about .
Temporal range: 40–2.5 Ma Oligocene-Pliocene
G.G. Simpson (1945)
The Borophaginae apparently descended from the subfamily Hesperocyoninae. The earliest and most primitive borophagine is the genus Archaeocyon, which is a small fox-sized animal mostly found in the fossil beds in western North America. The borophagines soon diversified into several major groups. They evolved to become considerably larger than their predecessors, and filled a wide range of niches in late Cenozoic North America, from small omnivores to powerful, bear-sized carnivores, such as Epicyon.
There are 66 identified borophagine species, including 18 new ones that range from the Orellan to Blancan ages. A phylogenetic analysis of the species was conducted using cladistic methods, with Hesperocyoninae as an archaic group of canids, as the outgroup. Aside from some transitional forms, Borophaginae can be organized into four major clades: Phlaocyonini, Cynarctina, Aelurodontina, and Borophagina (all erected as new tribes or subtribes). The Borophaginae begins with a group of small fox-sized genera, such as Archaeocyon, Oxetocyon, Otarocyon, and Rhizocyon, in the Orellan through early Arikareean stages. These canids reached their maximum diversity of species around 28 million years ago.
Often generically referred to as "bone-crushing dogs" for their powerful teeth and jaws, and hyena-like features (although their dentition was more primitive than that of hyenas), their fossils are abundant and widespread; in all likelihood, they were probably one of the top predators of their ecosystems. Their good fossil record has also allowed a detailed reconstruction of their phylogeny, showing that the group was highly diverse in its heyday. All Borophaginae had a small fifth toe on their rear feet (similar to the toes that bear dew claws on the front feet), where as all modern Caninae have only four toes normally.
Noteworthy genera in this group are Aelurodon, Epicyon, and Borophagus (=Osteoborus). According to Xiaoming Wang, the Borophaginae played broad ecological roles that are performed by at least three living carnivoran families, Canidae (which they were a part of), Hyaenidae, and Procyonidae.
Borophagine taxonomy, following Wang et al.
- Family Canidae
(million years=in existence)
- Subfamily †Borophaginae
- †Archaeocyon 33—26 Ma, existing
- †Oxetocyon 33—28 Ma, existing
- †Otarocyon 34—30 Ma, existing
- †Rhizocyon 33—26 Ma, existing
- Tribe †Phlaocyonini 33—13 Ma, existing
- Tribe †Borophagini 30—3 Ma, existing
- †Cormocyon 30—20 Ma, existing
- †Desmocyon 25—16 Ma, existing
- †Metatomarctus 19—16 Ma, existing
- †Euoplocyon 18—16 Ma, existing )
- †Psalidocyon 16—13 Ma, existing
- †Microtomarctus 21—13 Ma, existing (
- †Protomarctus 20—16 Ma, existing (
- †Tephrocyon 16—14 Ma, existing
- Subtribe †Cynarctina 20—10 Ma, existing
- Subtribe †Aelurodontina 20—5 Ma, existing
- Subtribe †Borophagina
- Subfamily †Borophaginae
Cladogram showing borophagine interrelationships, following Wang et al., figure 141:
According to an analysis of the fossil record of North American fossil carnivorans, the decline of borophagines from a diversity of about 30 species 15 million years ago to extinction was largely driven by competition with felids and canines. Felids invaded the continent from Eurasia about 20 million years ago and were better ambush predators, in part due to their retractable claws. Climate change, which led to the replacement of North American forests with grasslands, may also have been a factor; borophagines were less suited to running down prey than canines.
- Simpson, G.G. 1945. The principles of classification and a classification of mammals. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 85:i–xvi, 1–350.
- http://paleodb.org/cgi-bin/bridge.pl?action=checkTaxonInfo&taxon_no=83323&is_real_user=1 Paleobiology Database: Borophaginae
- Postanowicz, Rebecca. "Lioncrusher's Domain: Canidae". Archived from the original on 2006-03-19. Retrieved 2006-04-12.
- Wang, Xiaoming; Richard Tedford; Beryl Taylor (1999-11-17). "Phylogenetic systematics of the borophaginae". Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History. 243. hdl:2246/1588.
- Alan Turner, "National Geographic: Prehistoric Mammals" (Washington, D.C.: Firecrest Books Ltd., 2004), pp. 112–114. ISBN 0-7922-7134-3
- Wang, Xiaoming; and Tedford, Richard H. Dogs: Their Fossil Relatives and Evolutionary History. New York: Columbia University Press, 2008. p44
- Silvestro, D.; Antonelli, A.; Salamin, N.; Quental, T. B. (2015). "The role of clade competition in the diversification of North American canids". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 112 (28): 8684–8689. PMC . PMID 26124128. doi:10.1073/pnas.1502803112.
- Perry, D. (2015-08-14). "Smarts, stealth and retractable claws: Science confirms cats are better than dogs". OregonLive.com. The Oregonian. Archived from the original on 2015-08-18. Retrieved 2016-09-03.
- Figueirido, B.; Martín-Serra, A.; Tseng, Z. J.; Janis, C. M. (2015-08-18). "Habitat changes and changing predatory habits in North American fossil canids". Nature Communications. 6: 7976. PMID 26285033. doi:10.1038/ncomms8976.
- Wang, X.; Tedford, R. H.; Antón, M. (2010). Dogs: Their Fossil Relatives and Evolutionary History. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-13529-0.