Talk:Bob Iger/Archives/2016
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Elisfkc in topic Lead section
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Lead section
What exactly are the issues with my changes? I firmly believe that my revisions provide a clear and chronological presentation of information, improved formatting, and overall, a concise summation of the whole article—which is the basis for WP:LEAD. In addition to the contrary of my aforementioned points, the previous version included ancillary information, an overabundance of sources, unnecessary factoids, and even content lifted directly from corporate PR statements. ~ Jedi94 (Want to tell me something?) 16:02, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
You don't have your facts straight and you are merging their Bob igers Clumbseyninja (talk) 17:38, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
There are two Bob igers Clumbseyninja (talk) 17:38, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Clumbseyninja: enlighten us, who is the second one and what are the issues? Elisfkc (talk) 18:04, 27 August 2016 (UTC)