Talk:Beyond the Red Line

Team breakup and new projects

Why does any mention of the fact that the team has split keep being removed? That is certainly factual information and it would be dishonest to allow the Beyond the Red Line team to continue to represent themselves as the one which won the awards mentioned when few members of that original team remain on their staff. Several pages about computer game companies include information about break ups and splits (Pages like Volition,_Inc. and Black Isle Studios come to mind). --Karajorma (talk) 20:59, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

I certainly agree. Including a short sentence or two about the split (especially such a major one) happening can hardly be called advertising. LtCannonfodder (talk) 21:16, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Maybe this edit will be more suitable. No mention of the new project and instead a mention of exactly how it affects BtRL instead. --Karajorma (talk) 21:18, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

The edit by 68.49.45.115 was clearly by a 3rd party editor. Besides you having broken the Three-revert rule rule twice now, you can hardly blame a neutral party for advertising. Nor can you blame it on advertising when you remove factual information that had no mention whatsoever of the new team, but simply mentioned the split. -- Mt zhate (talk) 22:33, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

I made the edit. I am 'General Battuta' in Hard Light; I am not a member of the Diaspora team and I was (and remain) a big fan of Beyond the Red Line. I just thought the factual information would be useful here. 128.135.137.148 (talk) 23:18, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

In any case, whoever keeps removing the information about the split is accusing the Diaspora team of advertising on this page when he himself is clearly editing the facts to suit his interests. Blowfishpro (talk) 23:29, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Okay. I'm editing the previous section instead since the last one seems to be a bone of contention for 76.124.12.181. Since I know who is behind those edits I'm going to tell him to respond on the talk page rather than simply deleting or reversing it. --Karajorma (talk) 08:12, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Beyond the Red Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.shacknews.com/featuredarticle.x?id=489
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081005202707/http://www.mbnet.fi/nettijatkot/2008/03/hh2008/ to http://www.mbnet.fi/nettijatkot/2008/03/hh2008/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080322030922/http://www.atomicgamer.com/article.php?id=488 to http://www.atomicgamer.com/article.php?id=488

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:22, 19 July 2017 (UTC)