Talk:Battle of Unsan

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleBattle of Unsan has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 31, 2010Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 27, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the defeat of the US 8th Cavalry Regiment at the Battle of Unsan has been called "one of the most devastating US losses of the Korean War."?
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on October 25, 2018, October 25, 2020, and October 25, 2022.

Hangul Name Differences edit

The English article stats "운산군 전투" as the name in Hangul but the corresponding Korean Wikipedia article stats the title as "운산-영변 전투". I am changing the English article's Hangul to that of the Korean article uses. If you have a reason to disagree please state so here. Cheers~ ₪RicknAsia₪ 14:06, 6 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Question: Why is the Korean battle name refers to the town of Yongbyong, even through official South Korean history did not link the engagement at Unsan with the one at Yongbyong? Is the defense of Yongbyong in aftermath of Unsan battle considered to be part of "Battle of Unsan" for some South Korean historians? Jim101 (talk) 14:45, 6 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
This is when I back off admitting I am in over my head. I appreciate your response including your questions, which I unfortunately cannot answer intelligently. Cheers~ ₪RicknAsia₪ 15:31, 6 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
That's alright, at least you solved my no-Korean-romanization problem ;D Jim101 (talk) 15:39, 6 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Unsan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:58, 28 October 2016 (UTC)Reply