Talk:Bathurst Island (Northern Territory)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Requested move edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved Mike Cline (talk) 19:18, 28 April 2012 (UTC)Reply



Bathurst Island (Northern Territory)Bathurst Island (Australia) – to match corresponding request at Talk:Bathurst Island to use countries as disambiguation. 70.49.124.147 (talk) 04:15, 20 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

other page was moved, so that talk is located now at Talk:Bathurst Island (Canada) -- 70.49.124.225 (talk) 06:16, 27 April 2012 (UTC) Reply
It was moved again, so that the talk is now located at Talk:Bathurst Island (Nunavut) -- 70.49.124.225 (talk) 04:05, 28 April 2012 (UTC) Reply

Survey edit

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
  • Oppose per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (places): "Places are often disambiguated by the country in which they lie, if this is sufficient. However, when tags are required for places in Argentina (except province capitals that are named like the province), Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, India, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Federated States of Micronesia, South Africa or the United States, use the name of the state, province, territory, region (Italy only) or county (Ireland only), or department (France only) if the place lies within a single such entity." Also, I have moved the Canadian-related article to a qualifier of (Nunavut). -- JHunterJ (talk) 10:58, 27 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Discussion edit

  • "Australia" is certainly a better disambiguator, as it is recognizable to more readers than "Northern Territory." There are only two Wiki topics for "Bathurst Island", and this one is more notable. It got 5,200 page views in the last 90 days, compared to 3,300 for the Canadian island. So it should be primary, per WP:TWODABS. Kauffner (talk) 02:09, 22 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
    • That's not enough to show primarity. There should be a disambiguation page. 70.49.124.225 (talk) 05:42, 22 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bathurst Island (Northern Territory). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:55, 28 October 2016 (UTC)Reply