Talk:Bangladesh Premier League

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 117.97.193.244 in topic 9674932442

http://bplt20.actionboard.net

edit

http://bplt20.actionboard.net is not the official website for the BPL. It is just a fan forum/blog containing bogus information. All references to this website and any content sourced from this website should be removed or verfied from reputabe sources (eg. The Daily Star, Cricinfo) Rubaisport (talk) 06:46, 20 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

http://bplt20.net

edit

www.bplt20.net is also not the official webportal for the tournament. The official website www.bplt20.com.bd was outdated throughout the second session and the site seems to be down now too.

Since, the link www.bplt20.com.bd is still mentioned on the 2013_Bangladesh_Premier_League page, I am changing the link in this article too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Imehedi (talkcontribs) 17:17, 24 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Match fixing

edit

I've integrated the match-fixing article, which was an orphan, into here, also tried to make the content encyclopedic rather than gossip. If any editor is unhappy with this please post to my talk page Chrismorey (talk) 20:30, 30 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Defunct Franchises

edit

Why have the old franchises been deleted from the defunct list? Old team like Chittagong Kings is not the same as Chittagong Vikings. They are different teams with different owners and different history. It is possible for one city to have more than one team. So Sylhet Superstars is not Sylhet Royals with a new name it is a complete different team. Adding the old teams on the defunct list shows the rich history BPL has so please use some sense and stop deleting it. Mauryan313 (talk) 19:01, 17 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

As a note, I plan to act on this concern unless anyone has an objection. The old and new franchises need splitting apart and their records being displayed separately. It's a big job as there are tonnes of pages to sort out, but I think it's important to do as the current arrangement where we imagine that they are the same thing seems factually incorrect.
So, any objections? Blue Square Thing (talk) 11:45, 5 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

October 2016

edit

So, I've been through and pretty much gutted the article just now to avoid a mass of repetition, undue emphasis on certain bits and bobs and some slightly off-piste written English. It needs a tonne of references and probably someone to look over things and make suggestions at least as to what might go in. Blue Square Thing (talk) 20:01, 13 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bangladesh Premier League. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:22, 14 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

9674932442

edit

Monir hossain Ghorami — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.97.193.244 (talk) 04:36, 18 May 2022 (UTC)Reply