Talk:Atopy (philosophy)

Philosophy: Social and political / Continental Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Social and political philosophy
	Continental philosophy

useless edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

this article is absolutely useless. it's completely vague and gives no concrete definition, only a bunch of references to examples and concepts that one is left on one's own to connect conceptually. please, someone fix this, it is embarrassing for continental philosophy as a whole. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.171.45.245 (talk) 19:42, 9 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

I don't think the article is absolutely useless. I for one think I understood it—however, perhaps I'm not a philosopher. It's not because it's been improved, because the content hasn't been edited since 2011.

This is completely unrelated, but I also observed that your three sentence comment contains absolutely no capital letters, even thouch you probably live on a continent where English writing is commonly taught as part of education as a whole. This might—conceptually or concretely—fit the definition of embarrassment for your (former?) writing or English teacher. I was vaguely amused myself. Ken K. Smith (a.k.a. Thin Smek) (talk) 14:54, 19 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic