This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The last sentence "Carreira and co-workers achieved significantly higher enantiomeric excesses (up to 99%) using stoichiometric amounts of the (1S, 2R)-enantiomer of N-methylephedrine (D) at room temperature with a broad range of aldehydes, and generating the alkynylzinc compound using Zn(OTf)2." refers to just one experiment, not clear to me why this and "Carreira and co-workers" should be notable in an encyclopedia unless it can be shown to be discussed more broadly in the literature. Note that this article and many others in chemistry and econometrics were created by a group of PhD students who were blocked because they had not disclosed that they were paid to do so. Many of their lemmas and I would argue this one, too, are too specific for an encyclopedia. Antimanipulator (talk) 19:45, 28 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
