Wikipedia

Talk:Ashutosh Tewari

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page
Former featured article candidateAshutosh Tewari is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 10, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
September 13, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former featured article candidate


GA Review edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago6 comments1 person in discussion
This review is transcluded from Talk:Ashutosh Tewari/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    *There are a handful of capitalization errors throughout the article; please fix these.
    Specifically, "over 2400 Robotically assisted procedures", "field of Genitourinary robotic surgery", "Impact of robotics on surgical Skill". Emw2012 (talk) 14:56, 3 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
    All set, just three more issues (the only ones not crossed out in 2, 3 and 6) to go. Emw2012 (talk) 02:30, 8 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
    • External links should be removed, or moved out of the text into an 'External links' section.
    • Since it is a technical term, 'prostatectomy' should be mentioned and wikilinked in the 'Robotic prostatectomy' section (but not wikilinked in the heading).
    • More terms should be wikilinked (e.g. Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi Memorial Medical College, McH, DNB, others)
    • Parts of the 'Honors, awards, and prizes' section looks copy/pasted from its only source, http://www.cornellphysicians.com/aktewari/awardsandhonors.html. Try further changing the wording around, since it's copyrighted. Also, take a look at similar sections in other GA's on biologists and medical scientists (e.g. George Schaller, Pamela C. Rasmussen); they are almost all in prose. At almost 20 items, the list distracts from the small ~16KB article -- consider converting it to prose (preferable) or shortening it to less than 10 items.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    • While many statements are referenced, those references tend to be quite bare. In line with suggestions at this article's recent FAC (which apply to this GAN, more or less), the references should be expanded to include author and/or publisher, date, accessdate, etc. See Wikipedia:Citing_sources/example_style. For scientific publications, it's often helpful to link to the publication or its abstract, as well as its DOI or PMID.
    This still needs to be done. Emw2012 (talk) 14:56, 3 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    • Is there a reason that commentary on Tewari's research in the article is so sparse, considering that he has over 200 publications?
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    • The second image in the article, Image:Virtual_Reality_OR.jpg, is listed as under GFDL even though the source website (http://www.cornellurology.com/roboticprostatectomy/) states at the bottom of the page that the content is copyrighted by Cornell University (and may also be copyrighted by Healthcommunities.com). Unless a cogent fair use rationale can be outlined or appropriate permission from Cornell or Healthcommunities.com obtained, the image should be removed.
    Still outstanding. Emw2012 (talk) 14:56, 3 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    • The article needs improvement, but I don't think it's so bad as to warrant failing for now. Try addressing these concerns, and any more that may sprout up, within a week. Again, I'd strongly suggest using the aforementioned GA's on biologists and medical scientists, or maybe even the FA's Charles Darwin or Barbara McClintock, as a template for this article. Good luck! Emw2012 (talk) 23:30, 26 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
    • Due to several concerns (see feedback for criteria 2, 3 and 6) still being outstanding after several weeks, I'm failing Tewari's article for GAN. I suggest renominating it once the concerns outlined above have been fixed. Emw2012 (talk) 15:40, 13 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 14 external links on Ashutosh Tewari. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:27, 19 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Ashutosh Tewari. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:00, 10 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ashutosh_Tewari&oldid=1206183908"