Talk:Aromobates nocturnus

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Micromesistius in topic Most definitely not the only species

I've added a reference to back up the fact that it's endangered but I hope there's a better reference than I've used. Free free to substitute. Mrs.EasterBunny (talk) 18:52, 19 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Most definitely not the only species edit

The term 'Aromobatidae' redirects to this article mentioning one single species and claiming it's the only species of the genus Aromobates, and apparently also of the whole family Aromobatidae. This is absolutely not true. According to a current list of the AMNH, the genus Aromobates contains twelve species, and the family Aromobatidae consists of three subfamilies with five genera and 104 species altogether.

To fix this, the redirect from Aromobatidae to this article has to be removed, a new article 'Aromobatidae' to be written, and the article 'Skunk Frog' renamed to 'Skunk Frogs' and extended to contain twelve species of Aromobates. Here's an overview:

Family: Aromobatidae (104 sp.)

Subfamily: Allobatinae (46 sp.)
Genus Allobates (46 sp.)
Subfamily: Anomaloglossinae (26 sp.)
Genus Anomaloglossus (24 sp.)
Genus Rheobates (2 sp.)
Subfamily: Aromobatinae (31 sp.)
Genus Aromobates (12 sp.)
Genus Mannophryne (19 sp.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bwiesem (talkcontribs) 01:30, 11 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
This is now a proper species article, and the genus-level article has been amended. Micromesistius (talk) 19:20, 17 August 2014 (UTC)Reply