This redirect is within the scope of the Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dungeons & Dragons-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, or join the discussion, where you can join the project and find out how to help!Dungeons & DragonsWikipedia:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsTemplate:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsDungeons & Dragons articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
I'm not sure who made this article but I wanted to suggest that they change the title to Aribeth de Tylmarande (Aribeth's full name) rather than just Aribeth. It's more informative.
Somebody should upload her portrait in the game and put it here.
Latest comment: 18 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Aribeth is far too insignificant a character to merit her own article. She should have a passage or so in NWN's, and that's it. Get rid of this. MasterGrazzt 14:20, 8 February 2006 (UTC)Reply
I agree totally, there will never be enough information for her to have her own full article. Detailing every action of a single character within a single computer game isnt useful or indeed interesting to anyone, particularly one as obscure as 'Aribeth'. -- Lewis 00:41, 7 March 2006 (UTC)Reply
I've proposed to merge it, even though I think it might as well be totally deleted. -- Lewis 14:47, 14 March 2006 (UTC)Reply
