Talk:Amotion

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Sergecross73 in topic Source

Background

edit

If we're going to be writing bckgr, might as well just spell out background. Reb42 17:00, 14 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Move?

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was not done.  Skomorokh  10:42, 27 December 2009 (UTC)Reply


AMotionAmotion

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Comment

edit

Technically, this article is now called aMotion rather than AMotion. Is this acceptable? Furthermore, the article lead has been change to reflect this change. In fact, the album name is written as aMOTION on the cover. So now I am totally confused! Worse still, the info box still has it as Amotion... Oh and: their previous album is under Emotive (album) rather than eMotive (album) (despite the fact that the album cover styles it eMOTIVe). Any thoughts? --Jubilee♫clipman 04:43, 21 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

aMOTION and eMOTIVe ¦ Reisio (talk) 08:16, 21 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
Personally I don't see what's so confusing about it. It's written aMotion on the album cover so thats clearly how the band intended it to be written. Just because it's not standard doesn't mean it's wrong, otherwise Limp Bizkit would be moved to Limp Biscuit. The article name has to have the first letter capitalised because that's how the software is built (would be awesome if that could be changed) but other than that it should be aMotion. Danikat (talk) 11:21, 8 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Source

edit