This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
I see no encyclopedic value to the remark. It just seems to be there to give Jim a shout-out for no particularly good reason, especially when you consider that the alleged remark was made on a podcast rather than a traditional review.
I only did it cause (not because like a civilized person) he said it might happen sarcastically at the end. I'm being vague in case by some miracle, I don't get caught (which I might cause who gives a shit about this movie anyway, no offence to the user Greyjoy)