Talk:A Game of Thrones: Genesis

Merge with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Game_of_Thrones_%28role-playing_video_game%29?

Title says 'er all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.246.249.112 (talk) 04:15, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Good catch - didn't notice that other page. There's not really anything to merge there though. The other article can probably safely be deleted.Caidh (talk) 02:40, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

No, there's no need for merging or deletion. These are two SEPERATE games by Cyanide, at least that's how Cyanide states them in their official website cyanide-studio.com. Punkalyptic (talk) 22:46, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Neither meets notability guidelines. Neither has had the kind of significant coverage in 3rd party sources, particularly reviews of the games, that is required. Might be notable once released but not right now.--RadioFan (talk) 18:06, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

The Genesis article now has references from PC Magazine, PC Gamer, and Reuters. That is MORE than enough for a game before it is released. I cannot speak about Cyanide's other game based on the series - just this one (Game of Thrones: Genesis).Caidh (talk) 21:57, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

They did it: http://www.mondoxbox.com/en/news/29848/cyanide-announces-a-game-of-thrones-images.html --87.1.21.122 (talk) 15:17, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Oppose deletion of article

Strongly oppose deleting the article. There may be sources lacking but I don't think it falls under WP:Crystal at all. Adding several third party sources in a few moments. These should definitely be enough to avoid deleting the article.Caidh (talk) 14:16, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Favonian (talk) 10:22, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

---

A Game of Thrones: Genesis → A Game of Thrones - Genesis – Both on the official website and on Cyanide website they write it with - and not with :. 87.20.61.84 (talk) 09:10, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

• Comment. MOS:DASH would require that an en dash (–) is used, not a hyphen (-). Jenks24 (talk) 13:16, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
• Oppose; subtitles are set off with colons per house style. Powers ^T 13:41, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
• Oppose. I think this is just a style issue—how one decides to set off subtitles. As the comment above says, our "house style" is to do so with a colon. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 22:31, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
• Comment. I do see how the publisher does it, but prefer the colon myself. Amazon also uses the colon, if that means anything.-- Patrick, _oѺ^∞ 15:22, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Image

Maybe you want to insert this image: [1]. --87.6.42.135 (talk) 16:36, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Good call, I updated the infobox image, though I took the flat one instead, which is more common for Wikipedia.-- Patrick, _oѺ^∞ 18:11, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on A Game of Thrones: Genesis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110302130549/http://www.cyanide-studio.com:80/games/agot/? to http://www.cyanide-studio.com/games/agot/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:23, 1 October 2016 (UTC)