Talk:ARA Catamarca/GA1

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Sturmvogel 66 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 16:01, 1 July 2022 (UTC)Reply


  • Is there another Catamarca that would require the dab, or is it not necessary in the title?
  • MOS:BOLDLINK issue in the first sentence of the lead
  • The reason why she was built in Germany isn't in the body
  • Pennant number needs cited

Good work, placing on hold. Hog Farm Talk 19:46, 1 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

All done. I just left the dab in place, but I don't think that it's actually necessary. I'll move the article once you're done with it.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:06, 4 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
That was quick. Move done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:55, 4 July 2022 (UTC)Reply