Talk:ARA Catamarca

ARA Catamarca has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 4, 2022. (Reviewed version).

Military history: Maritime / South America

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	South American military history task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Argentina Low‑importance

	Argentina portal This article is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentina. If you would like to participate, you can improve ARA Catamarca, or sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.ArgentinaWikipedia:WikiProject ArgentinaTemplate:WikiProject ArgentinaArgentine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago4 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:ARA Catamarca (1912)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 16:01, 1 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Is there another Catamarca that would require the dab, or is it not necessary in the title?
MOS:BOLDLINK issue in the first sentence of the lead
The reason why she was built in Germany isn't in the body
Pennant number needs cited

Good work, placing on hold. Hog Farm _Talk 19:46, 1 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

All done. I just left the dab in place, but I don't think that it's actually necessary. I'll move the article once you're done with it.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:06, 4 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

That was quick. Move done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:55, 4 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic