Talk:1997 Women's Cricket World Cup final

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:1997 Women's Cricket World Cup Final/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kosack (talk · contribs) 09:12, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

I'll take this one on, will post review as soon as possible. Kosack (talk) 09:12, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Lead

• Might be worth linking wickets here for the uninitiated.
• Links for the Indian and English teams in the second paragraph?
  • Linked both. Harrias ^talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Background

• You use both eleven and 12 in successive sections here.
  • Changed both to words. Harrias ^talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
• Worth mentioning that England were the reigning holders?
  • Added. Harrias ^talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Australia

• Would the Ireland match have been counted in the final table standings? If so, would be worth explaining how they awarded points for it.
  • Have added a little, let me know if you think more is needed (in which case, I would need to explain the whole scoring system.) Harrias ^talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
• Worth linking wickets and One Day International again here.
  • Linked. Harrias ^talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
• "Australia scored 123 for seven led scores of 33 and 31", led by?
  • Oops, added. Harrias ^talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

New Zealand

• "uneven number of teams, only featured four other teams", a little repetitive with the double use of teams perhaps.
  • Changed the second to "sides". Harrias ^talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
• Worth linking umpires perhaps?
  • Linked. Harrias ^talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Summary

• In the lead, you have no link for Calcutta but include one here. I'd either have both linked or neither.
  • Removed. Harrias ^talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
• Emily Drumm is linked here but there is a Drumm mentioned in their route to the final section. I'm assuming it's the same one so the link needs moving up.
  • Sorted. Harrias ^talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
• Along similar lines, you drop the first name for Fitzpatrick, but include the first name for Hockley (and Drumm if the above point is agreed) in the same sentence.
  • Tidied. Harrias ^talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
• Note b is a little oddly placed as it seems to be describing the scoring method, but at this point it's halfway through the article and there are frequent uses of it prior.
  • Moved to the first use. Harrias ^talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

References

• Ref 13 could do with an accessdate.
  • Added. Harrias ^talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

In all honesty, I could probably pass this now and have no complaints as it's a very well-written piece. A couple of minor suggestions and adjustments above that could be looked at though, so placed on hold for now. Kosack (talk) 08:43, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

@Kosack: Many thanks for the review. I have responded to each point above. Harrias ^talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

I'm happy with all of the responses to the queries above, nice work. Happy to promote. Kosack (talk) 13:53, 14 August 2020 (UTC)