Talk:1925–26 Cardiff City F.C. season

Latest comment: 4 years ago by MWright96 in topic GA Review

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk21:55, 6 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Created by Kosack (talk). Self-nominated at 19:02, 25 July 2020 (UTC).Reply

  •   @Kosack: New enough and long enough. Sources are in the right place on the article and check out (AGF on the supporting book source though its content is backed by the club's records page as well). No issues in Earwig. You need a QPQ. Please ping me when QPQ is supplied. Raymie (tc) 01:21, 30 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:1925–26 Cardiff City F.C. season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 14:47, 9 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Am reviewing for the GAN October 2020 Backlog Drive. MWright96 (talk) 14:47, 9 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Lead

edit
  • "The 1925–26 season was the 25th season of competitive football played by Cardiff City F.C. and the team's fifth consecutive season" - repetition of "season"
  • "of the Football League." - the wikilink should not include the word "the"
  • "Hughie Ferguson, who was signed for a club record £5,000 in November 1925, was the club's top goalscorer." - repetition of "club"
  • Wikilink cap to Cap (sport)

First Division

edit
  • Wikilink penalty area and penalty kick
  • "inflicting their opponents first defeat of the season" - opponents'
  • "However, the team soon entered a dismal run of form," - the text in bold is informal
  • "before suffering defeat by the same scoreline against league leaders Sunderland." - being defeated
  • "but Birmingham recovered to take the victory." - what was the score?
  • "Stewart continued making changes and the club accepted an offer of £3,200 for Gill from Blackpool, the striker leaving after five years at the club." - repetition of "club"
  • "All three new signings started the club's next match against Leicester City and the trio combined to earn the club's first points at home for a month." - same issue as above
  • "helping his side to a 4–2 win over Notts County, Keenor adding his side's fourth." - repetition of "side"

Match table

edit
  • This table requires the addition of scope="col"s to the columns for MOS:DTT compliance

FA Cup

edit
  • "The side entered in the third round against fellow First Division side Burnley." - more repetition of the word "side"
  • The table in this section and the Welsh Cup section will need scope="col"s added to the columns to comply with MOS:DTT

Player details

edit
  • Wikilink cap to Cap (sport)
  • The player statstics table will require scope="col"s for the columns to comply with MOS:DTT

Aftermath

edit
  • "the club's first ever signing upon his arrival in 1910, left the club after 16 years." - repetition of "club"
  • "caused him to lose 22lbs in weight." - please use the convert template on the text indicated in bold

Will put the review on hold to allow the nominator to address or query the points raised above. MWright96 (talk) 16:08, 9 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

@MWright96: Thanks for the review, I've amended all of the points above. Let me know what you think. Kosack (talk) 18:01, 10 October 2020 (UTC)Reply