File talk:Wow-psp-cover.jpg

This file is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

File

This file does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

Squirtle (nom)
Slowpoke (Pokémon) (start)
Rayman (video game) (nom)
Setzer Gabbiani (start)
Game Boy Color (start)
Harold Halibut (nom)
Talim (Soulcalibur) (start)
Fusajiro Yamauchi (start)
Mr. Mime (start)
Bella Goth (nom)
Game Boy (nom)
Sonic Triple Trouble 16-Bit (nom)
Klefki (nom)
Sobble (start)
Exdeath (start)
Lucky Luna (nom)
Age of Empires: The Rise of Rome (start)
Mega Man X6 (nom)
38 Studios (start)
Pikachu (nom)
Reigns (video game) (start)
Fallout Online (start)
Donkey Kong (start)
Horizon Forbidden West (start)
Surround (video game) (start)
AirCars (start)
Laura Matsuda (start)
The Completionist (start)

DYK nominations

Reviews and reassessments

The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask (nom)
Hogwarts Legacy (rev)
Pokémon Channel (nom)
Rain World (rev)
Noctule (band) (rev)
Mario Kart: Double Dash (nom)

Articles that need...

Speedy deletion contested edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

First of all, this image is not a redundant copy of Image:Worms - Open Warfare Coverart.jpg, anyone can see it's not the same image.

Reason given by Salavat: (reverting cover change, original and better format (PNG), non-cryptic title)

First: Both images are JPG, why Salavat thinks it's PNG I don't know. Neither is it more original than this one. Second: The title has nothing to do with it whatsoever, since the image is only intended for use in one single article and thus don't have to be "user-firendly". Third: The other image is unnecessarily large, this one is much more effectively compressed with practically no loss in quality and higher resolution, which gives more detail for less bytes. --MrStalker ^talk 13:28, 8 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Add topic