 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 4 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,902 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Stanley v. City of Sandford is a pending United States Supreme Court case in which the Court will determine whether or not a former employee who was qualified to perform her job and who earned post-employment benefits while employed lose her right to sue over discrimination with respect to those benefits solely because she no longer holds her job, under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.[1]
| Stanley v. City of Sandford | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Full case name | Karyn D. Stanley v. City of Sandford, Florida |
| Docket no. | 23-997 |
| Case history | |
| Prior |
|
| Questions presented | |
| Under the Americans with Disabilities Act, does a former employee—who was qualified to perform her job and who earned post-employment benefits while employed—lose her right to sue over discrimination with respect to those benefits solely because she no longer holds her job? | |
Background
editKaryn D. Stanley employed as a firefighter in Sandford, Florida in 1999, where she served for fifteen years until 2016 when she was diagnosed with Parkinson's Disease, she countinued to work for two years until her physical condition left her incapable. In November 1, 2018, Stanley, took a disabilty retirement at the age of 47.[2]
When Stanley first joined the fire department in 1999, a policy is in effect where employees retiring for disability reasons were entitled to recieve free health insurance until they were 65 years old. However, in 2003, the city changed its plan, under the new policy, retirees were entitled to recieve free health insurance for twenty-four months after retiring. In the beginning of December 1, 2020, Stanley would be responsible for paying her insurance.
On April 2020, she sued the City of Sandford in the United States Middle District Court for the Middle District of Florida, arguing that, the city's benefits plan change discriminated retired employees under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Equal Protection Clause. The district court dismissed her claim, and granted summary judgement in favor of the city.
Stanley appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, but the court upheld the lower court's decision.[3]
Supreme Court
editThe Court granted the certiorari, and the case will be expected to be heard in October Term 2024.[4][5]
References
edit- ^ "Ex-Worker's High Court ADA Suit Raises Future Benefits Questions". news.bloomberglaw.com. Retrieved 12 July 2024.
- ^ "SCOTUS Appeals in Americans with Disabilities Act Case". natlawreview.com. Retrieved 12 July 2024.
- ^ "Former employee sued over benefits plan change: Why court dismissed ADA lawsuit | HRMorning". 25 October 2023. Retrieved 12 July 2024.
- ^ "Supreme Court to review division on ADA rights for former employees". www.dailyjournal.com. Retrieved 12 July 2024.
- ^ "Can disabled firefighter sue Sanford for cutting her benefits? US Supreme Court will decide". Orlando Sentinel. 26 June 2024. Retrieved 12 July 2024.