| Submission declined on 28 August 2024 by Sohom Datta (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 24 August 2024 by LR.127 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by LR.127 13 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 15 July 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by SafariScribe 52 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 29 June 2024 by MicrobiologyMarcus (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by MicrobiologyMarcus 2 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 28 June 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you. Declined by DoubleGrazing 2 months ago. | |
Comment: I'm not seeing enough here to allay any concerns of WP:BLP1E I might have. Sohom (talk) 02:42, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: As well as not shown to meet notability guidelines:MOS:PUFFERY - wording like "noted" in the lead section are not neutral and should not be included in the article.WP:EL - the external links section in this page is excessive. LR.127 (talk) 01:29, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Sourced by a lot of user generated content and primary sources. microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 14:24, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Mostly unreferenced. DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:05, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Nikhil Datar | |
|---|---|
| Born | 1 March 1970 |
| Alma mater | Sir Jamshedjee Jeejeebhoy Group of Hospitals (MBBS) |
| Occupation(s) | Practicing gynaecologist, medico-legal expert & noted health rights activist |
| Known for | Medical Director & Senior Gynaecologist at Cloudnine Hospital, Mumbai |
| Spouse | Smita Datar |
| Awards | Commonwealth Professional Fellowship- Patient Safety from UK & WHO 2009 Dr. Purandhare Gold Medal 1990 Mehman-E-Watan" award by the Sindh Government, Pakistan |
Nikhil D Datar is a senior consultant, obstetrician, and gynecologist based in Mumbai, India. He is also a medico-legal expert and a health rights activist in India.[1]
Education and career
editDr. Nikhil Datar is popularly known as a health rights activist who was instrumental in amending the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act (1971).[2]
Biography
editHis father Pandit D. K. Datar was an Indian Violinist and Padma Shri awardee and his mother Sudha Datar is a senior practicing gynecologist based in Goregaon Mumbai. His case, Dr. Nikhil Datar vs Union of India has paved the way for an amendment to the MTP Act. He, along with his patient Niketa Mehta, challenged the MTP Act in 2008[3]. He has helped over 300 women to seek the court's permission for termination of pregnancy beyond 20 weeks. This work is done pro bono by him.[4] He was appointed to a high-level committee by WHO and the Government of India on the national think-tank. [5]He was awarded a fellowship by the International Federation of Health and Human Rights in 2010. He was the recipient of the prestigious Commonwealth fellowship from the UK and worked on patient safety with the NHS in the UK and WHO in 2009. He sits on the advisory board of the Asian Center for Entertainment and Education (a sister organization of the Hollywood Health Society) along with eminent Bollywood personalities.[6][unreliable source?] He was a Recipient of Dr Purandare gold medal and Dr Dastur gold medal during his academic career.[citation needed]He is also a Founder and Trustee, “Forum for enhancing quality in health care”, an NGO working on quality in healthcare. [citation needed]
Honors
editHe was selected as “Unique Maharashtrian” by Lokmat group and “Mumbai Hero” by Mumbai Mirror[7]and Hindustan Times in 2018 and 2019.
References
edit- ^ "Gynaec 1st in Mumbai to give living will to custodian". The Times of India. 16 March 2024.
- ^ Gupta, Shivani (1 April 2024). "Meet the Doctor Who Fought An Archaic Law for 14 Long Years to Raise The Abortion Limit". The Better India.
- ^ Shelar, Jyoti (9 June 2019). "Abortion debate: 70 petitioners moved to court in last three years". The Hindu.
- ^ Porecha, Maitri (8 January 2023). "Despite Supreme Court judgment, abortion for unmarried women after 20 weeks a catch-22". The Hindu.
- ^ "Activists say 1971 MTP Act is outdated". The Asian Age. 2 August 2018.
- ^ "DMAI, FEQH & govt of Maharashtra to organize one-day workshop on patient safety on April 24". test.pharmabiz.com.
- ^ "Dr Nikhil Datar: Mumbai Heroes". mumbaimirror.indiatimes.com.